Ernest
Gombrich believed that an artwork is not in the eye of the beholder but in the
eye of an artist. He also believed that art reflected on different dispositions
of the painter such as its different emphasis. Gombrich analyzed paintings
through personal style, style of the period, choice and availability of, tools
used, and its medium. Its personal style deflected off of its temperament of
the artist, personality, and selected preferences. According to the tools used you would see
different things. With a pencil in hand the artist will see lines, and with a
brush in hand the artist will see different masses.
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Painting Description : HUP
Armored Train in Action
Gino Severini (Italian, 1883-1966)
1915. Oil on canvas, 45 5/8 x 34 7/8" (115.8 x 88.5 cm). Gift of Richard S. Zeisler. © 2012 Gino Severini / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / ADAGP, Paris
287.1986
In the
painting “Armored Train in Action” by Gino Severini (Italian, 1883-1966) is oil on canvas like most paintings are. If you
analyze the painting you actually see some shapes you would see in everyday
life such as, triangles, squares, and rectangles. There are five men on a train
in battle with guns, knows probaly as war or battle rifles. We also see with
the train there is a cannon attached to it. Gino Severini made the train to look
like metal with the illusion that there metal bolts holding the train together.
The people on the train with the guns are all facless. The first two you see alittle
of there face like color but you cant make a clear distinction of the eyes, mouth,
nose and ears. While the rest of them are hooded or covered. The green in the
painting can be trees as they past by in the train. The white smoke is from all
the gun fire the rifle guns that the men are using and the cannons on the train
which are being used as well.
I chose
this painting because the painting made me feel proud and sad at the same time.
The painting makes me proud is because people go to war or battle for what they
believe in and their rights. This painting also mad me sad because of all the men
out there having to leave their children and families by themselves not knowing
whether their coming back or not. The painting was made in 1915 which was the
year that italy entered world war, I think it was very risky of an artist to
paint things that may have happened or not. This painting could have came from his
imagination but had some very realistic facts and truths of what happened,
which I think is very important.
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
kind of my outline.
INTRODUCTION
Question:
How does Tennessee Williams use stage directions (the
non-verbal instructions that accompany the play's spoken aspects) to develop
the characters Stanley and Blanche?
Thesis:
Tennessee Williams uses the stage directions in the play as
a way to give background information on the protagonist Blanche and Stanley’s sexual
& drinking habits.
Characteristics
1.
Blanche
·
Loquacious (excessive talking)
·
fragile woman
·
Sexual - her sexual desires come out when she
drinks.
·
Liar
·
Cautious and has anxiety
·
A drunk
I.
Blanche: “takes a few uncertain steps towards bedroom, looks
in. turns back, spies open door of kitchen cabinet, crosses to it, removes a
whiskey bottle and glass, comes to above table and pours herself stiff drink”(Williams,
pg.9)
II.
Blanche: “I know you must have some liquor on
the place. Where can it be, I wonder? (Turns upstage.) Oh, I spy! I spy! (Crosses to kitchen
cabinet. Blanche takes bottle and glass from it. They nearly slip from her
grasp. She is shaking, panting for breath, and tries to laugh. Stella moves to
L. of Blanche, takes bottle.”(Williams, pg.10)
2.
Stanley
·
Aggressive – becomes this when he drinks.
·
Sexual
·
Passionate
·
A drunk
I.
Stanley: “(bringing liquor bottle and glass to
table.) In laurel, huh? Oh, yeah. Yeah, laurel that’s right. Not in my
territory. (Holds up bottle to observe its depletion.) Liquor goes fast in hot
weather. Have a shot? (Pours a drink.)” (Williams, pg.18)
II.
Stage direction: “empty beer bottles are strung
about, and a couple of liquor bottles, half empty, are in evidence.”(Williams,
pg.30)
COMPARE
1.
Blanche & Stanley
·
Drunks
·
Sexual
CONTRAST
1.
Blanche
·
Loose
·
Flirtatious – makes her feel wanted
I.
“(Crosses to him. Touching his shoulders.)” (Williams, pg.59)
II.
“(Touches his cheek lightly, and smiles. Then goes
to trunk.)” (Williams, pg.59)
2.
Stanley
·
Aggressive
I.
“(Stanley hears rumpus in living-room, and charges
in. Steve stops him. Pushes Steve aside.)”
·
Argues
II.
“(In bedroom, Stanley has stopped below Mitch to
tell him. That’s the last time you’ll play the radio during my poker game!”)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)